State v. Miller
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
- —
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
State v. Miller
Opinion of the Court
A jury found defendant guilty of attempted aggravated robbery of a filling station in Minneapolis. On this appeal from the judgment of conviction, defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and that certain in-custody statements of defendant were inadmissible because they were, as a matter of law, involuntary. The voluntariness of defendant’s inculpatory statements was, by any standard,
Affirmed.
In State v. Keiser, 274 Minn. 265, 143 N. W. 2d 75 (1966), we considered the widely varying judicial opinion as to whether, on the issue of voluntariness of a confession, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt, rather than by mere preponderance of the evidence, that the confession was voluntarily made. We concluded that the higher standard of proof was required. In so far as it is an issue under the United States Constitution, it has now been determined that it need be proved only by a preponderance of the evidence. Lego v. Twomey, 404 U. S. 477, 92 S. Ct. 619, 30 L. ed. 2d 618 (1972).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE v. CHARLES FRANCIS MILLER
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published