Rueben v. Ebeneezer Home
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1974, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Sappa v. Strite-Anderson Manufacturing Company (Minn. 1974)
- In re Estate of Lea (Minn. 1974)
- Winona National & Savings Bank v. Sheehan (Minn. 1974)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Certiorari to review a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission awarding employee compensation and medical benefits on the basis of total and permanent disability.
Relators challenge the finding of permanent total disability and claim the services now performed by employee negate that finding.
No purpose would be served in restating the facts involved in this appeal. It is sufficient to say that upon a careful review of the proceedings herein, it is the opinion of this court that the finding of permanent total disability of the employee is supported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record submitted and that the limited services performed by the employee do not negate that finding.
Respondent is allowed $400 attorney’s fees on this appeal.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.