Minnesota Supreme Court, 1973

State v. Haaf

State v. Haaf
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided June 15, 1973
296 Minn. 532; 208 N.W.2d 302; 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1271 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Thomson, Wylde, Nordby, Friedberg & Rapoport and Jack S. Nordby, for petitioner., Warren Spannaus, Attorney General, John Burns, County Attorney, Katz, Taube, Lange & Frommelt, and Emanuel Z. Kopstein, for respondent.

State v. Haaf

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The alternative writ of prohibition issued by this court in the above entitled matter on December 8, 1972, is herewith made absolute. Accordingly, the prosecution of James Haaf, arising out of an indictment dated January 5, 1972, charging him with committing the crime of bribery on November 9, 1970, in violation of Minn. St. 609.42, subd. 1(1), is permanently enjoined.

Because the court is divided on the reasons for reaching its conclusion, no opinion accompanies its decision.

Writ of prohibition made absolute.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.