Strand v. Travelers Insurance Company
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
- —
- —
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
Strand v. Travelers Insurance Company
Opinion
A jury found that defendant insurance company acted in bad faith in refusing to settle a personal injury claim against its insured, plaintiff’s assignor, within the limits of the automobile insurance policy. The court denied defendant’s blended post-trial motion for judgment n. o. v. or a new trial, concluding that the jury’s verdict was fully sustained by the evidence. The court further concluded the action had been commenced within the time limitations of Minn. St. 541.05(1), the applicable statute, and that the proper measure of damages was the full amount of *312 the difference between the policy limit and the verdict in the initial action, undiminished by the discharge in bankruptcy of plaintiff’s assignor. We hold that the trial court rulings on matters of law were correct and that the jury’s verdict has sufficient evidentiary support.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Thomas Strand v. Travelers Insurance Company.
- Cited By
- 6 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Insurance — action against insurer who refused to settle claim — finding of bad faith — sufficiency of evidence.