Ronyak v. Pangerl
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1987, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ness v. Ylvisaker (Minn. Ct. App. 1987)
- Markowitz v. Ness (Minn. Ct. App. 1987)
- Finch v. Wemlinger (Minn. 1985)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
This is a personal injury action arising out of an accident between an automobile owned and operated by defendant Paul R. Pangerl, in which plaintiff was riding as a passenger, and an automobile owned and operated by defendant Henry L. Parker. The jury exonerated Parker and found Pangerl’s negligence to be the proximate cause of the accident. It awarded plaintiff $20,000. Plaintiff appeals on the grounds Parker was negligent as a matter of law.
The collision occurred when the automobile occupied by plaintiff was in the process of making a left turn at an intersection. There was a sharp conflict in the testimony as to the circumstances of the accident. The evidence concerning the physical facts, such as the damage to the vehicles, the point of impact indicated by debris on the highway, and the position of the cars after the accident is sufficient to support the verdict.
*557 Other issues, not presented to the trial court, will not be considered for the first time on appeal.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.