Ehlmann v. Ehlmann
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1976, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Salminen v. Frankson (Minn. 1976)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Defendant husband challenges orders of the district court modifying a divorce decree (Ehlmann v. Ehlmann, 278 Minn. 370, 154 N. W. 2d 684 [1967]) to increase the amount of money payable to plaintiff for the support of a minor child of the parties. Although the timeliness of the appeal is doubtful, we have carefully considered the record on its merits and conclude that under all the circumstances the court did not abuse its discretion in so modifying the decree.
Plaintiff is awarded $350 attorneys fees on this appeal.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.