St. Paul Bar & Restaurant Equipment Co. v. Di Martino
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1979, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Lattimore v. City of Laurel (Miss. 1999)
- Glennidra Lattimore v. City of Laurel, Mississippi (Miss. 1998)
- Kossak v. Stalling (Minn. 1979)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from an order of. the St. Paul municipal court denying plaintiffs motion for a new trial or amended findings and conclusions of law in an action on an account for supplies furnished by plaintiff to defendants.
The trial court found that the supplies were delivered to the restaurant operated by a corporate entity which has since become defunct and ceased to operate; and that plaintiff, contrary to its contention that defendants were operating the restaurant as a partnership, was doing business with the restaurant as a corporation.
We have examined the record and the authorities submitted and conclude that the findings of the trial court are not clearly erroneous.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.