O'NEIL v. Corrick

Minnesota Supreme Court
O'NEIL v. Corrick, 239 N.W.2d 230 (Minn. 1976)
307 Minn. 497; 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1469
Kelly

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 3 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

O'NEIL v. Corrick

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal by plaintiff, acting as his own attorney, from judgment entered against him in an action against the attorneys who represented his deceased former wife in her divorce suit against him, a suit which ended in settlement. We have carefully examined the record and conclude that the trial court properly dismissed plaintiff’s action and granted defendants summary judgment. Plaintiff failed to comply with an order that he either provide full and complete answers to written interrogatories within 30 days or have his action dismissed, and there *498 fore dismissal or default judgment was justified under Rule 37.02 (2) (c), Rules of Civil Procedure.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Kelly took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Reference

Full Case Name
ALBERT THOMAS O’NEIL, SR. v. WILLIAM J. CORRICK AND OTHERS, ALSO KNOWN AS AND D.B.A. CORRICK, MILLER, MEYER & NELSON
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published