Mickelson v. Bennett
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1983, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Hogenson v. Brian Knox Builders (Minn. Ct. App. 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is a proceeding to determine eligibility for certain unemployment benefits. The commissioner of employment services determined that claimant was eligible for the benefits and that the relator’s experience-rating account was chargeable therefor. The essence of the finding of the commissioner was that the claimant was “involuntarily separated from his employment.”
On appeal, both parties agree that the principal question presented is which of two entities was claimant’s employer within the meaning of the Employment Services Law, Minn.St. c. 268. Because this purely factual question has not been decided by the fact-finder, we have decided that this case must be remanded to the commissioner for such a determination, and for whatever conclusion may result once that fact is determined.
Remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.