Lee v. Yellow Taxi Cab Co. of Minneapolis
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1991, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- HIGGINS ON BEHALF OF HIGGINS v. Winter (Minn. Ct. App. 1991)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff, Juanita Lee, brought this action for injuries allegedly sustained on February 16, 1973, when she fell from defendant’s taxicab. Defendant denied both its negligence and plaintiff’s damages. The case was tried before a jury which returned a general verdict in favor of defendant. Plaintiff has appealed from the denial of her motion for a new trial.
The trial court did not err in refusing to admit evidence concerning the California medical and hospital expenses because there was absolutely no evidence submitted by plaintiff to establish a causal connection between those expenses and her fall from defendant’s taxicab.
The lost exhibits, consisting of certain hospital records concerning plaintiffs stay in Hennepin County Medical Center and Mt. Sinai Hospital at times prior to the date of the taxicab accident, were offered by defendant to show that the injuries alleged by plaintiff in this action were preexisting and not caused by the incident involved in this case. It is impossible to see how the plaintiff was prejudiced by the failure of the jury to have these exhibits with them in the jury room.
Other issues raised by plaintiff on this appeal have been considered and are without merit.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.