State v. Carr
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1979, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- State v. Hamilton (Minn. 1979)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of charges of aggravated robbery, Minn.St. 609.245, and theft of property valued at more than $2,500, Minn.St. 609.52, and was sentenced by the trial court to concurrent prison terms of 3 to 20 years for the robbery and 0 to 5 years for the theft. On this appeal from judgment of conviction, defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on the identification issue and also contends that the trial court violated Minn.St. 609.035, the so-called single-behavioral-incident statute, in sentencing him for both offenses. There is no merit to the first contention but there is merit to the second one. In fact, the state concedes that the trial court erred in sentencing defendant for both offenses since they arose from the same incident and, accordingly, requests that the sentences be vacated and the case remanded for resen-tencing.
Sentences vacated; remanded for resen-tencing.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.