Lillehei v. Lillehei
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
- —
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
Lillehei v. Lillehei
Opinion of the Court
Joyce Lillehei appeals from the portion of the judgment and decree of marital dissolution entered on October 12, 1978, which limited her award of alimony of $800 per month to a period of two years. We reverse in part and remand with instructions.
The sole issue presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion in terminating alimony upon the expiration of the two-year period. It is our view that the durational limitation on the payment of alimony must be vacated in accordance with our decisions in Ruzic v. Ruzic, 281 N.W.2d 502 (Minn. 1979), and Arundel v. Arundel, 281 N.W.2d 663 (Minn. 1979). Minn.Stat. § 518.55 (1976). This decision is not intended to affect the right of respondent James Lillehei to seek a termination of the alimony payments upon an expiration of the two-year period or at any other appropriate time pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 518.64 (1978).
It is noteworthy that this matter arose prior to the implementation of § 518.552 (1978), effective March 1, 1979. A review of the facts presented indicates that the portion of the judgment and decree at issue would in all likelihood have been affirmed had that statute been applicable to these proceedings. See Otis v. Otis,-N.W.2d - (Minn. 1980), filed October 3, 1980.
Therefore, consistent with this opinion, the matter is reversed in part and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
Reversed in part and remanded.
Concurring Opinion
(concurring specially).
I concur in the result.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Joyce Wellsley LILLEHEI, Appellant, v. James Perry LILLEHEI, Respondent
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published