Minnesota Supreme Court, 1980

Crea v. Bly

Crea v. Bly
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided October 10, 1980 · Otis, Yetka, Scott, Todd, Amdahl, Simonett
298 N.W.2d 66; 1980 Minn. LEXIS 1616 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Dean K. Johnson and Michael C. Lind-berg, Bloomington, for appellant., Dudley & Smith, Terence Durkin, and Dean D. Larsen, St. Paul, for Crea., Patrick R. Sweeney, St. Paul, for Bly et al.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2008, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Crea v. Bly

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OTIS, Justice.

By special verdicts the jury below found that on January 2, 1977, Mark Montanari made an unprovoked attack on Anthony Crea in a parking lot adjacent to Mancini’s Bar, West St. Paul; that Montanari was aided, abetted, instructed or encouraged by Sally Bly to make the attack; that Crea did not provoke the attack; that Mancini’s Bar did not serve liquor to Montanari when he was obviously intoxicated;, that Mancini’s Bar did serve liquor to Sally Bly when she was obviously intoxicated and therefore contributed to her intoxication; that the intoxication of Bly caused plaintiff Crea's damages; that Crea was entitled to $20,000 compensatory damages and $5,000 .punitive damages; and that as between Montanari and Bly, each contributed 50% to the altercation.

The trial court held that Bly, Montanari and Mancini’s Bar were each liable to Crea for 33½% of the damages. We affirm as to Montanari and Bly and reverse as to Mancini’s Bar, and hold as a matter of law that there was a break in the chain of causation between Mancini’s contributing to Bly’s intoxication and the injuries inflicted on Crea by Montanari. While the duties of dram shops to the public are and should be onerous, they do not extend to anticipating and protecting the public from the excesses of third parties beguiled into committing assaults on innocent victims by the importuning of intoxicated female patrons.

Reversed.

TODD, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. *67 AMDAHL and SIMONETT, JJ., not having been members of this court at the time of argument and submission, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.