State v. Nystrom
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026) Amendment history from the Minnesota Revisor of Statutes. A later amendment does not necessarily affect this decision's analysis — check the current statute text.Cites Minnesota statutes amended since this decision
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Minnesota statutes cited
Sections of the Minnesota Statutes this opinion cites.
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- State v. Oldenburg (Neb. Ct. App. 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from an order of the Ramsey County District Court, Juvenile Division, granting the state’s motion pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 260.125 (1978) to refer the juvenile in question, who is now 18 years old, for prosecution as an adult. This appeal raises the issue of whether the district court clearly erred in its findings or abused its discretion in determining that the public safety would be endangered by keeping the juvenile in the juvenile court system. We hold that the juvenile court did not clearly err in any. of its findings or abuse its discretion in its determination on the issue of dangerousness. In the Matter of the Welfare of K.P.H., 289 N.W.2d 722 (Minn. 1980).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.