State v. Romanowski
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026) Amendment history from the Minnesota Revisor of Statutes. A later amendment does not necessarily affect this decision's analysis — check the current statute text.Cites Minnesota statutes amended since this decision
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Minnesota statutes cited
Sections of the Minnesota Statutes this opinion cites.
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from judgment of conviction of simple robbery, Minn.Stat. § 609.24 (1976), in which the defendant, who is serving a 10-year prison term, contends (1) that the judgment of conviction should be reversed on the ground that the juvenile court abused its discretion in referring him for prosecution as an adult or (2) that he should at least be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea, on which the judgment of conviction was based, because the record made at the time he entered his plea fails to demonstrate that his plea was voluntary and intelligent. There is no merit to either the first contention, In the Matter of the Welfare of K.P.H., 289 N.W.2d 722 (Minn. 1980), or the second, State v. Nace, 308 Minn. 170, 241 N.W.2d 101 (1976).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.