Minnesota Supreme Court, 1980

State v. Stigen

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided July 3, 1980 · Sheran

295 N.W.2d 382; 1980 Minn. LEXIS 1515 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

C. Paul Jones, Public Defender, and Kathleen Rauenhorst, Asst. Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant., Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Thomas L. Johnson, County Atty., Vernon E. Bergstrom, Asst. County Atty., Chief, App. Div., David W. Larson, Asst. County Atty., Dorothy Florence and Thomas A. Weist, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1986, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Cites Minnesota statutes amended since this decision

Minn. Stat. § 609.58 — amended 1983 (since repealed)

Amendment history from the Minnesota Revisor of Statutes. A later amendment does not necessarily affect this decision's analysis — check the current statute text.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Minnesota statutes cited

Sections of the Minnesota Statutes this opinion cites.

Minn. Stat. § 609.58

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Sutherlin (Minn. 1986)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

SHERAN, Chief Justice.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of burglary, Minn. Stat. § 609.58, subd. 2(3) (1978) (unlawful entry of a building with intent to commit a felony or gross misdemeanor therein). The trial court sentenced defendant to a maximum prison term of 5 years. Issues raised by defendant on this appeal from judgment of conviction relate to the sufficiency of the evidence, the admission of Spreigl evidence, the admission of evidence that defendant remained silent when he was first questioned by the police, and the trial court’s refusal to submit misdemeanor trespass as a lesser offense. We affirm.

The burglary charge arose from defendant’s early morning unlawful entry of an unoccupied room in a Minneapolis hotel using one of a large number of hotel keys which he unlawfully possessed. Defendant was caught in the act and one of the other keys, as well as other evidence, connected defendant to a recent unsolved burglary of a different but occupied room in the same hotel, a burglary which facilitated the theft of a number of items of personal property from the guests in that room. We hold that evidence of this prior burglary was properly admitted in defendant’s trial. We also hold that the evidence of defendant’s guilt was sufficient.

Defense counsel did not object to the prosecutor’s apparently unintentional elicitation of evidence that when he was arrested and given a Miranda warning defendant declined to talk with the police. Therefore, defendant is deemed to have forfeited his right to have this issue considered on appeal.

There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in refusing to submit misdemeanor trespass, Minn.Stat. *384§ 609.605(6) (1978). It is questionable whether this is a lesser included offense of the offense with which defendant was charged. In any event, the evidence in this case did not produce a rational basis for a verdict acquitting defendant of the offense charged and convicting him of the lesser offense. State v. McDonald, 312 Minn. 320, 251 N.W.2d 705 (1977); State v. Malzac, 309 Minn. 300, 244 N.W.2d 258 (1976); State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 228 N.W.2d 120 (1975).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.