Minnesota Supreme Court, 1981

Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Blum

Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Blum
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided March 13, 1981 · Wahl
304 N.W.2d 328; 1981 Minn. LEXIS 1227 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Thomson & Nordby, St. Paul, for appellant., Jesse & Cosgrove, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1984, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Blum

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

Defendant Lois E. Blum seeks to appeal from an order of the district court granting the motion of plaintiff Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. to have its requests for admission deemed admitted in this subrogation action to recover amounts paid on a fiduciary bond. Minn.R.Civ.App. P. 103.03 makes no provision for appeal of pretrial discovery orders, and we have stated that the appropriate means to obtain review of such orders is by a petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus. Parker v. Hennepin County District Court, Fourth Judicial District, 285 N.W.2d 81 (Minn. 1979); Mampel v. Eastern Heights State Bank of St. Paul, 254 N.W.2d 375 (Minn. 1977). Nonetheless, the Parker case raised the identical issue here presented and is, therefore, controlling. We see no benefit in dismissing the appeal rather than applying Parker despite the procedural irregularity.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.