Minnesota Supreme Court, 1981

Page v. Blake

Page v. Blake
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided September 4, 1981
309 N.W.2d 802; 1981 Minn. LEXIS 1410 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Hoke, Roehrdanz, Bigelow, Chamberlain & Goldsmith and Warren V. Bigelow, Jr., Minneapolis, for appellant., Sahr, Kunert & Tambornino, Roger T. Sahr and Paul Kunert, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1984, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Page v. Blake

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial or judgment n.o.v. The trial court adopted the jury’s findings: 1) that defendant was negligent in the operation of a vehicle in which plaintiff was a passenger; 2) that plaintiff’s damages amounted to $31,250; and 3) that plaintiff was not permanently injured.

We hold that the finding as to damages and the finding as to permanency are irreconcilable. Carufel v. Steven, 293 N.W.2d 47 (Minn. 1980). Accordingly we reverse and remand for a new trial on those issues only.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.