State v. Simmons
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026) Amendment history from the Minnesota Revisor of Statutes. A later amendment does not necessarily affect this decision's analysis — check the current statute text.Cites Minnesota statutes amended since this decision
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Minnesota statutes cited
Sections of the Minnesota Statutes this opinion cites.
Opinion of the Court
Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of aggravated robbery, Minn. Stat. § 609.245 (1982), for his role in the robbery of a service station, and was sentenced by the trial court to an executed term of 54 months in prison pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 609.11 (1982) and Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines and Commentary, II.E. (1982). On this appeal from judgment of conviction defendant contends that the evidence identifying him as a participant in the robbery was legally insufficient. There is no merit to this contention. The evidence of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming, consisting of (1) positive identification of defendant as the gunman by the one victim who got a good look at the gunman; (2) positive identification of defendant’s car as a car having been used in casing the station on the day in question; and (3) testimony
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.