In Re the Discipline of Kimmel

Minnesota Supreme Court
In Re the Discipline of Kimmel, 347 N.W.2d 52 (Minn. 1984)
1984 Minn. LEXIS 1334

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 2 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

In Re the Discipline of Kimmel

Opinion

ORDER

WHEREAS, by decision of this court filed July 23, 1982, In re Kimmel, 322 N.W.2d 224 (Minn. 1982), respondent’s practice has been restricted to examiner of titles throughout the remainder of his probation in connection with State of Minnesota v. Harold Dean Kimmel, Washington County, - # 4479, Pine County # 64-25B; and

WHEREAS, by order of the Washington County District Court dated April 2, 1984, respondent was discharged from probation; and

WHEREAS, respondent has satisfied all current Continuing Legal Education requirements and has paid all past and current attorney registration fees;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, consistent with the original opinion of this court and upon the respondent’s demonstrated satisfactory completion of the terms of the suspension from practice, respondent is reinstated to practice law. Minn.R.Law.Prof. Resp. 18 is deemed inapplicable to these proceedings.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of the Application for the Discipline of Harold D. KIMMEL, Jr., an Attorney at Law of the State of Minnesota
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published