In re the Discipline of Kimmel
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1988, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Keithley (Kan. 1993)
- In re Reinstatement of Williams (Minn. 1988)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
WHEREAS, by decision of this court filed July 23, 1982, In re Kimmel, 322 N.W.2d 224 (Minn. 1982), respondent’s practice has been restricted to examiner of titles throughout the remainder of his probation in connection with State of Minnesota v. Harold Dean Kimmel, Washington County, - # 4479, Pine County # 64-25B; and
WHEREAS, by order of the Washington County District Court dated April 2, 1984, respondent was discharged from probation; and
WHEREAS, respondent has satisfied all current Continuing Legal Education requirements and has paid all past and current attorney registration fees;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, consistent with the original opinion of this court and upon the respondent’s demonstrated satisfactory completion of the terms of the suspension from practice, respondent is reinstated to practice law. Minn.R.Law.Prof. Resp. 18 is deemed inapplicable to these proceedings.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.