Minnesota Supreme Court, 1985

Victory Lutheran Church v. County of Hennepin

Victory Lutheran Church v. County of Hennepin
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided August 23, 1985 · Amdahl
373 N.W.2d 279; 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1165 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Brent W. Primus, Patrick R. Burns, Minneapolis, for relator., Thomas L. Johnson, Hennepin Co. Atty., Joyce Y. Miyamoto, Asst. Co. Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1995, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Cites Minnesota statutes amended since this decision

Amendment history from the Minnesota Revisor of Statutes. A later amendment does not necessarily affect this decision's analysis — check the current statute text.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Victory Lutheran Church v. County of Hennepin

Minnesota statutes cited

Sections of the Minnesota Statutes this opinion cites.

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

Victory Lutheran Church petitioned the Tax Court for review of the 1983 real estate tax assessment on a single family residence it owns at 4315 Thomas Avenue North in Minneapolis. The Tax Court determined that the property did not qualify for an exemption from taxation as church property under Minn.Stat. § 272.02, subd. 1(5) (1984). We reverse.

The issue of entitlement of church owned property to an exemption has infrequently been addressed by this court, but the test is whether the property is devoted to and reasonably necessary for the accomplishment of church purposes. State v. Board of Foreign Missions of Augustana Synod, 221 Minn. 536, 541, 22 N.W.2d 642, 645 (1946).

Upon the record before us, we conclude that the property is reasonably necessary to the accomplishment of church purposes and that the decision of the Tax Court to the contrary is without sufficient evidentia-ry support. The residence owned by Victory Lutheran is located on property immediately adjacent to the church sanctuary. Since its acquisition in 1964, the property has been used to house assistant pastors and youth directors and has been exempt from taxation. In 1982, the church decided that the congregation’s needs would be best served by permitting a married couple to live in the home in exchange for their provision of custodial services to the church.

The couple pays no rent and occupies the residence pursuant to an oral agreement. Their proximity to the church enables them to fulfill many of the responsibilities for which they were hired, including light cleaning chores, providing access to the sanctuary and church offices, providing a measure of security for both the church and its members during evening hours, and keeping the church sidewalks free from snow and ice. Several items of church equipment and property are stored in the basement and garage of the residence.

Although our review of Tax Court decisions is limited, Nagaraja v. Commissioner of Revenue, 352 N.W.2d 373, 376 (Minn. 1984), the record here requires the *281 conclusion that the subject property is exempt from taxation under Minn.Stat. § 272.02, subd. 1(5) (1984).

Reversed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.