State v. Budke
Minnesota Supreme Court
State v. Budke, 371 N.W.2d 533 (Minn. 1985)
1985 Minn. LEXIS 1144
Wahl
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
- —
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
State v. Budke
Opinion
Donald and Kathleen Budke were convicted of violating Minnesota’s compulsory school attendance law. On appeal, a three-judge district court panel reversed their convictions based on its belief that the Budke’s first amendment rights had been infringed.
We affirm the reversal of the Budkes’ convictions for the reasons set forth in our opinion in State v. Newstrom, 371 N.W.2d 525 (Minn. 1985). We do not reach the first amendment issues raised in this appeal.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE of Minnesota, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Donald BUDKE and Kathleen Budke, Respondents
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published