Rediske v. Minnesota Valley Breeders' Ass'n

Minnesota Supreme Court
Rediske v. Minnesota Valley Breeders' Ass'n, 377 N.W.2d 459 (Minn. 1985)
1985 Minn. LEXIS 1278

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 1 citing opinion

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Rediske v. Minnesota Valley Breeders' Ass'n

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petitions for further review are granted for the limited purpose of considering the propriety of the remand to the trial court for a determination of comparative fault on issues of both fraud and negligence and the question of whether it was error to submit to the jury Vernon Rediske’s claim of negligence against Minnesota Valley Breeder’s Association and Maust. Other issues to which the petitions have been addressed will not be considered by the court. The petitioner shall proceed as the appellant and briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.

Reference

Full Case Name
Vernon H. REDISKE, (C0-85-180) v. MINNESOTA VALLEY BREEDERS' ASSOCIATION, d.b.a. MVBA Harvestore Systems, Minnesota Valley Breeders' Association, d.b.a. MVBA Harvestore Systems and Robert Maust, (C0-85-180), A.O. Smith Harvestor Products, Inc., AgriStor Leasing
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published