Rediske v. Minnesota Valley Breeders' Ass'n
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1985, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Rediske v. MINNESOTA VALLEY BREEDERS'ASS'N (Minn. 1985)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Based upon all the files records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petitions for further review are granted for the limited purpose of considering the propriety of the remand to the trial court for a determination of comparative fault on issues of both fraud and negligence and the question of whether it was error to submit to the jury Vernon Rediske’s claim of negligence against Minnesota Valley Breeder’s Association and Maust. Other issues to which the petitions have been addressed will not be considered by the court. The petitioner shall proceed as the appellant and briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.