In re Disciplinary Action Against Oldenkamp
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1988, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Burns (Minn. 1988)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
WHEREAS, a petition and supplemental petitions for disciplinary action against Roger L. Oldenkamp have been pending in this court since June 24, 1985; and
WHEREAS, by order filed on October 31, 1985, this court directed the immediate transfer of the respondent to disability inactive status as an attorney in accordance with the respondent’s request and Rule 28(b)(2), Minn.R.Law.Prof.Resp.; and
WHEREAS, upon motion of the Director, Lawyers Professional Responsibility, this court by order filed on October 7, 1986, remanded the matter to the referee with instructions to determine whether the disability continues or whether the hearing on the several petitions for disciplinary action shall proceed; and
WHEREAS, the referee filed his findings and recommendation that the respondent be removed from disability inactive status and be immediately suspended from the practice of law pending the outcome of disciplinary proceedings; and
WHEREAS, on March 4, 1987, this court conducted a hearing en banc on the order to show cause filed on January 29, 1987; and
WHEREAS, Minn.R.Law.Prof.Resp. 28(c)(1) provides that in proceedings to transfer a lawyer from disability inactive status counsel shall be appointed to represent the lawyer if he does not retain counsel; and
WHEREAS, the respondent was not represented by a lawyer at the hearing on March 4, 1987, and counsel was not appointed to represent him;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this court declines to direct the respondent’s removal from disability inactive status at this time.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.