Minnesota Supreme Court, 1987

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action of Schmidt

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action of Schmidt
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided September 10, 1987
413 N.W.2d 502; 1987 Minn. LEXIS 825 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action of Schmidt

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WHEREAS, this court did by order dated March 20, 1987, publicly reprimand the respondent Douglas E. Schmidt and suspend him from the practice of law for a period of six months thereafter, and

WHEREAS, the order of public reprimand and suspension provided that respondent comply with Rule 26, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and

WHEREAS, the respondent has furnished to this court proof that he has complied with Rule 26, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and has paid costs and disbursements of the original disciplinary proceeding,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:

That respondent Douglas E. Schmidt is hereby reinstated to the unrestricted practice of law in the State of Minnesota effective September 20, 1987.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.