Lake City Apartments v. Lund-Martin Co.
Minnesota Supreme Court
Lake City Apartments v. Lund-Martin Co., 421 N.W.2d 302 (Minn. 1988)
1988 WL 25231
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
- —
- —
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
Lake City Apartments v. Lund-Martin Co.
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Swanson Plumbing & Heating, Inc.’s motion to *303 accept its petition for further review be, and the same is, granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions of Lund-Martin Company and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company and Swanson Plumbing & Heating, Inc. for further review be, and the same are granted for the limited purpose of remanding to the court of appeals for reconsideration in light of this court’s decision in Wittmer v. Rugemer d.b.a. Norco Construction, 419 N.W.2d 493 (Minn. 1988).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- LAKE CITY APARTMENTS, Appellant, v. LUND-MARTIN CO., Et Al., Respondents, Miller Hanson Westerbeck Bell Architects, Inc., Et Al., Defendants; And MILLER HANSON WESTERBECK BELL ARCHITECTS, INC., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. LUNDQUIST, WILMAR, SCHULTZ AND MARTIN, INC., Etc., Third-Party Defendants; And LUND-MARTIN CO., Et Al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. SWANSON PLUMBING & HEATING, INC., Et Al., Third-Party Defendants
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published