Friesen's, Inc. v. Larson

Minnesota Supreme Court
Friesen's, Inc. v. Larson, 443 N.W.2d 830 (Minn. 1989)
1989 Minn. LEXIS 193; 1989 WL 88854
Popovich

Can I rely on this case?

No — this case has been overruled or significantly limited

Based on 2 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Friesen's, Inc. v. Larson

Opinion

POPOVICH, Chief Justice.

We granted the petition of Donovan, McCarthy, Crassweller, Larson & Magie, P.A. to review the decision of the court of appeals reversing the summary judgment in petitioner’s favor in the St. Louis County District Court in this legal malpractice action. Friesens, Inc. v. Arnold Larson, 438 *831 N.W.2d 444 (Minn.App. 1989). We reverse and reinstate the summary judgment.

The facts and procedural history are detailed in the decision of the court of appeals. It is our view that the trial court properly entered summary judgment against the plaintiff on its claim that the defendant law firm was negligent in failing to provide adequate representation. The record persuades us that there exist no genuine issues of material fact that the alleged negligence in the performance of legal representation prior to January 1, 1983, the time when the firm’s supervision and control over the file ceased, was causally related to any damages plaintiff might have incurred. Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe, 291 N.W.2d 686, 692 (Minn. 1980).

Reversed and summary judgment reinstated.

Reference

Full Case Name
FRIESEN’S, INC., Et Al., Appellants, v. Arnold LARSON, Donovan, McCarthy, Crassweller, Larson & Magie, P.A., James Balmer, Et Al., Respondents
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published