State v. Torgerson
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1994, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Minnesota statutes cited
Sections of the Minnesota Statutes this opinion cites.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Stevens (Conn. 1993)
- Boland v. Commissioner of Public Safety (Minn. Ct. App. 1994)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
STATE of Minnesota, Appellant,
v.
Victor Wilmar TORGERSON, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Joel A. Watne, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, and Teresa Joppa, Asst. City Atty., Moorhead, for appellant.
Bruce Ringstrom, Moorhead, for respondent.
Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.
KEITH, Justice.
We granted the state's petition for review in this case while the consolidated appeals were pending in State v. Piotrowski, 453 N.W.2d 689 (Minn., filed herewith). On the basis of our opinion deciding those appeals, we now reverse the decision of the court of appeals.
Defendant was involved in a one-car roll-over near Dilworth, Minnesota. Officer Hendrickson of the Moorhead Police Department, who was dispatched to the scene, found the driver, defendant, being treated *699 by ambulance personnel, who took defendant to a hospital in nearby Fargo, North Dakota. Officer Hendrickson noticed signs of intoxication while talking with defendant in the hospital. After administering some sobriety tests, the officer arrested defendant for DWI in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.121 (1988). Defendant then submitted to a blood alcohol test. In the subsequent prosecution of defendant in Minnesota, the trial court suppressed the test results, relying on the court of appeals' decisions in the Piotrowski cases.
Consistent with our decision in the Piotrowski cases, filed herewith, we reverse the decision of the court of appeals affirming the trial court's suppression order.
Reversed and remanded for trial.
WAHL, Justice, dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. For the reasons set out in my dissent in State v. Piotrowski, 453 N.W.2d 689 (1990), decided today, I would affirm the decision of the court of appeals in State v. Torgerson.
POPOVICH, Chief Justice (dissenting).
I join in the dissent of Justice Wahl.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.