State v. Torgerson
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
- —
- —
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
State v. Torgerson
Opinion of the Court
We granted the state’s petition for review in this case while the consolidated appeals were pending in State v. Piotrowski, 453 N.W.2d 689 (Minn., filed herewith). On the basis of our opinion deciding those appeals, we now reverse the decision of the court of appeals.
Defendant was involved in a one-car rollover near Dilworth, Minnesota. Officer Hendrickson of the Moorhead Police Department, who was dispatched to the scene, found the driver, defendant, being treated
Consistent with our decision in the Pio-trowski cases, filed herewith, we reverse the decision of the court of appeals affirming the trial court’s suppression order.
Reversed and remanded for trial.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. For the reasons set out in my dissent in State v. Piotrowski, 453 N.W.2d 689 (1990), decided today, I would affirm the decision of the court of appeals in State v. Torgerson.
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting).
I join in the dissent of Justice Wahl.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Victor Wilmar TORGERSON, Respondent
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published