Minnesota Supreme Court, 1990

In re Disciplinary Action Against Hunter

In re Disciplinary Action Against Hunter
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided December 10, 1990
463 N.W.2d 535; 1990 Minn. LEXIS 399; 1990 WL 200172 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1991, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

In re Disciplinary Action Against Hunter

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition with this court seeking revocation of probation and further disciplinary action against respondent, James W. Hunter, Jr. The petition alleges that respondent, while on probation from a previous disciplinary action, committed misconduct including misappropriation of client funds by means of forgery and misrepresentation, failure to cooperate with the Director’s investigation, unauthorized practice of law during his disciplinary suspension, and suspension for non-payment of attorney registration fees. In conjunction with those proceedings, the Director has petitioned this court, pursuant to Rule 16, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), for an order temporarily suspending respondent from the practice of law pending final disposition of the disciplinary proceedings. The Director asserts that the continuation of respondent’s authority to practice law may result in risk of injury to the public, within the meaning of Rule 16(a), RLPR. Respondent, by letter dated November 30, 1990, has indicated to the court that he does not contest entry of the proposed order.

Having considered the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS ORDERED:

1) That the respondent James W. Hunter, Jr., be and hereby is, temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending final determination of the disciplinary proceedings, pursuant to Rule 16, RLPR.

2) That respondent shall, within 10 days of this order, notify each of his clients of his inability to continue representation of the client, and shall otherwise fully comply with Rule 26, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.