In re the Placement of Johnson
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026) Amendment history from the Minnesota Revisor of Statutes. A later amendment does not necessarily affect this decision's analysis — check the current statute text.Cites Minnesota statutes amended since this decision
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Minnesota statutes cited
Sections of the Minnesota Statutes this opinion cites.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Independent School District No. 199 for further review be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of reversing the determination that the writ of cer-tiorari was timely filed. By operation of Minn.Stat. § 606.01, a timely writ of certio-rari would have necessarily been issued within 60 days after Johnson “received due notice of the proceeding sought to be reviewed,” namely, within 60 days of the May 2,1991 notification of the action of the school district. See Roseville Education Ass’n. v. I.S.D. # 623, 391 N.W.2d 846 (Minn. 1986) and Dokmo v. I.S.D. # 11, 459 N.W.2d 671 (Minn. 1990). The writ of cer-tiorari is discharged.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.