State v. Alt
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2004, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Bailey (Minn. 2004)
- State v. Russell (Wash. 1994)
- State v. Bloom (Minn. 1994)
- State v. Copeland (Wash. 1996)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
Prior report: Minn.App., 504 N.W.2d 38.
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Daryl Duane Alt for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of making it clear that the only DNA frequency evidence to be admitted at trial is the population frequency evidence of the individual bands. State v. Johnson, 498 N.W.2d 10 (Minn. 1993); State v. Jobe, 486 N.W.2d 407 (Minn. 1992); State v. Kim, 398 N.W.2d 544 (Minn. 1987). Remanded for trial.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.