Minnesota Supreme Court, 1994

Lindgren v. Clearwater National Corp.

Lindgren v. Clearwater National Corp.
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided May 26, 1994 · No. C6-93-1556
517 N.W.2d 574; 1994 Minn. LEXIS 411; 1994 WL 236902 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1998, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Lindgren v. Clearwater National Corp.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals filed on February 1, 1994 be, and the same is, reversed. The court of appeals’ decision reversed the summary judgment entered in favor of defendants Clearwater National Corporation and remanded to the trial court for its consideration of extrinsic evidence of the parties’ intent and its resolution of the question of whether conditions precedent contained in the document entitled “letter of intent” were satisfied.

In construing the document as executed on October 27, 1992, the trial court focused on paragraph 7, which provided that:

[t]he parties shall enter into a definite purchase agreement which shall be drafted by the buyers within 30 days.

The trial court concluded that the “letter of intent” merely created an agreement to negotiate in good faith and that it was not the complete and final agreement the parties contemplated would govern the conveyance of the real estate at issue. We agree with that construction and direct the reinstatement of the summary judgment in favor of the defendant sellers, Clearwater National Corporation, et al.

Reversed and summary judgment reinstated.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ M. Jeanne Coyne Associate Justice

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.