Minnesota Supreme Court, 1994

State v. Bauer

State v. Bauer
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided April 29, 1994 · Keith
516 N.W.2d 174; 1994 Minn. LEXIS 358; 1994 WL 169981 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

John Stuart, Minnesota Public Defender, Melissa Sheridan, Asst. Public Defender, St. Paul, for appellant., Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Mary J. Theisen, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2025, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

State v. Bauer

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

We granted the petition of Keith Loren Bauer for review of the court of appeals’ decision affirming his conviction of sexually penetrating a 12-year-old girl 512 NW2d 112. DNA evidence was admitted at trial, including expert testimony that Bauer’s DNA profile “matched” the DNA profile of semen which the victim said Bauer had ejaculated into her mouth. Bauer argues that the trial court went too far in allowing the expert to testify that there was a “match.” We conclude otherwise. See State v. Bloom, 516 N.W.2d 159 (Minn. 1994), filed herewith.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.