State v. Bauer
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2025, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Taylor v. State (Okla. Crim. App. 1995)
- State v. Bloom (Minn. 1994)
- State v. Pirsig (Minn. Ct. App. 2003)
- State v. Schneider (Minn. 1999)
- State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Michael Holeman (Minn. Ct. App. 2025)
- State of Minnesota v. Scott Jeffrey Hanson (Minn. Ct. App. 2016)
- Adams v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2003)
- State v. Traylor (Minn. Ct. App. 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION
We granted the petition of Keith Loren Bauer for review of the court of appeals’ decision affirming his conviction of sexually penetrating a 12-year-old girl 512 NW2d 112. DNA evidence was admitted at trial, including expert testimony that Bauer’s DNA profile “matched” the DNA profile of semen which the victim said Bauer had ejaculated into her mouth. Bauer argues that the trial court went too far in allowing the expert to testify that there was a “match.” We conclude otherwise. See State v. Bloom, 516 N.W.2d 159 (Minn. 1994), filed herewith.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.