In re Disciplinary Action Against Steele
In re Disciplinary Action Against Steele
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WHEREAS, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging, with specificity, that respondent Peter Mark Steele has engaged in serious and continued neglect of his responsibilities in representing six named clients, including failure to inform them, or misinforming them, of the status of the matters in which he was representing them and, in some instances, failure to comply with court-ordered directives in regard to some of these matters, and alleging that respondent practiced law during a time when he was automatically suspended from practice for failure to pay attorney registration fees; and
WHEREAS, the respondent has unconditionally admitted the allegations of the petition, has waived any rights he has pursuant to Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they jointly recommend that respondent be suspended from practice for a period of 9 months and comply with numerous requirements prior to any application for reinstatement, and that, if reinstated, respondent shall be placed on 2 years’ probation with conditions to be agreed upon by the court at the time of reinstatement; and
WHEREAS, this court has independently reviewed the record and agrees that the conduct admitted to by respondent warrants the agreed to disposition,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Peter Mark Steele is suspended from
BY THE COURT:
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Peter Mark STEELE, an Attorney at Law of the State of Minnesota
- Status
- Published