Abad v. ISCO, INC.
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2003, among the opinions in this site’s citation index. Amendment history from the Minnesota Revisor of Statutes. A later amendment does not necessarily affect this decision's analysis — check the current statute text.Cites Minnesota statutes amended since this decision
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Minnesota statutes cited
Sections of the Minnesota Statutes this opinion cites.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Podvin v. Jamar Co. (Minn. Ct. App. 2003)
- Jones v. Billings County School District 1 (N.D. 1997)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of defendant ISCO, Inc. for further re *621 view of the July 25,1995 decision of the court of appeals be, and the same is, granted for the purpose of reversing that decision and reinstating the summary judgment entered in defendant’s favor in the Hennepin County District Court. The trial court properly concluded that, under the recorded circumstances, there was no genuine issue of material fact as to whether “good cause” existed for the plaintiffs’ failure to commence this action during the 2-year period from the filing of a notice of intent to dissolve, Minn. Stat. § 302A.7291, to formal dissolution. See Minn.Stat. § 302A.781.
BY THE COURT:
A.M. Keith Chief Justice
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.