Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Minnesota Supreme Court, 1995

Hoagland v. State

Hoagland v. State
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided November 2, 1995 · Alan
539 N.W.2d 392; 1995 Minn. LEXIS 966; 1995 WL 681470 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mark D. Nyvold, Special Assistant State Public Defender, St. Paul, for Appellant., Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Minnesota Attorney General, St. Paul, Michael 0. Freeman, Hennepin County Attorney, Beverly J. Wolfe, Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, for Respondent.

Hoagland v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order of the district court dated March 2,1995, denying defendant, Leland M. Hoagland, a new trial after a remand hearing pursuant to Hoagland v. State, 518 N.W.2d 531 (Minn. 1994) be, and the same is, affirmed. The trial court on remand concluded, on the basis of detailed findings, that the state had met its burden of proving that the state would be unduly prejudiced by having to retry the case. Affirmed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alan C. Page Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.