Minnesota Supreme Court, 1996

In re Disciplinary Action Against Merlin

In re Disciplinary Action Against Merlin
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1996 · Alan
549 N.W.2d 625; 1996 Minn. LEXIS 433; 1996 WL 385404 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

In re Disciplinary Action Against Merlin

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon the application of the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, pursuant to Rule 12(c)(1), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and upon evidence that respondent, Carol Sue Merlin, cannot be found in the state or served personally with the petition for disciplinary action,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of law. Respondent has 1 year from the date of the filing of this order to move for vacation of the order for suspension and for leave to answer the disciplinary petition.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alan C. Page Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.