In re Disciplinary Action Against Eichhorn-Hicks
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2018, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Eichhorn-Hicks (Minn. 2018)
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eichhorn-Hicks (Wis. 2012)
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tracy R. Eichhorn-Hicks (Wis. 2023)
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tracy R. Eichhorn-Hicks (Wis. 2014)
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Eichhorn-Hicks (Minn. 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that *357 respondent Tracy R. Eiehhorn-Hicks committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, misuse of his trust account, failure to maintain proper trust account records, temporary misappropriation of funds, false certification on Ms attorney registration statements and false statements to the Director in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.15(a), (c), (h), and (i), 8.1(a)(1), 8.4(c), 8.4(d), and Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board Opinion Nos. 9 and 15.
Respondent admits his conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, waives his rights pursuant to Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and has entered into a stipulation with the Director wherein they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a one-year suspension from the practice of law and payment of $900 in costs and disbursements pursuant to Rule 24(d), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), with reinstatement conditioned on successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the bar examination. The parties further agree that the reinstatement hearing provided for under Rule 18, RLPR, is not waived.
This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Tracy R. Eichhorn-Hicks is suspended for one year and he shall pay $900 in costs and disbursements pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR. Respondent shall successfully complete the professional responsibility portion of the bar examination prior to reinstatement and the reinstatement hearing under Rule 18, RLPR, is not waived.
BY THE COURT:
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.