Minnesota Supreme Court, 2000

In re Disciplinary Action Against Selmer

In re Disciplinary Action Against Selmer
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided November 29, 2000 · Alan, Consideration, Gilbert, Took
619 N.W.2d 424; 2000 Minn. LEXIS 754; 2000 WL 1790102 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

In re Disciplinary Action Against Selmer

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

In 1997, this court suspended Scott E. Selmer from the practice of law for 12 months for professional misconduct. See In re Selmer, 568 N.W.2d 702 (Minn. 1997). The court conditioned reinstatement on compliance with Rules 18 and 26, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). See id. at 705.

On October 24, 2000, Selmer filed a petition for reinstatement. However, there is no indication that he has complied with the requirements of Rules 18 and 26, RLPR.

NOW, THEREFORE, based on the records, files, and proceedings herein,

IT HEREBY IS ORDERED that Scott E. Selmer’s petition for reinstatement is denied. Selmer may file a new petition for reinstatement as provided by Rule 18, RLPR.

BY THE COURT

Alan C. Page Associate Justice GILBERT, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.