Minnesota Supreme Court, 2001

Thomas v. CARPET DESIGN CENTER

Thomas v. CARPET DESIGN CENTER
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided February 14, 2001 · By the Court H
622 N.W.2d 120; 2001 Minn. LEXIS 78; 2001 WL 171001 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Kurtis A. Greenley, Lindquist & Ven-num, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, for petitioner-respondent., Jeffrey J. Lindquist, Pustorino, Tilton & Parrington, P.A., Minneapolis, for relator.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2001, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Thomas v. CARPET DESIGN CENTER

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 16, 2000, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 136.01, subd. 1(b).

Employee is awarded $600 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT

James H. Gilbert Associate Justice

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.