Minnesota Supreme Court, 2001

Oakgrove v. McTo

Oakgrove v. McTo
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided June 25, 2001
628 N.W.2d 596; 2001 Minn. LEXIS 408; 2001 WL 748474 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

David B. Kempston, Law Office of Thomas D. Mottaz, Anoka, for Relator., Roger H. Willhaus, Pustorino, Tilton, Parrington & Lindquist, P.L.L.C., Minneapolis, for respondent employer., Mike Hatch, Attorney General, Rory H. Foley, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, for intervenor Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2001, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Oakgrove v. McTo

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed March 9, 2001, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 136.01, subd. 1(b).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joan Ericksen Lancaster Associate Justice

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.