Minnesota Supreme Court, 2001

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Dvorak

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Dvorak
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided January 2, 2001 · Alan, Anderson
620 N.W.2d 908; 2001 Minn. LEXIS 4; 2001 WL 25817 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2008, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Dvorak

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action based upon the order of the Supreme Court of North Dakota suspending respondent Shirley A. Dvorak for one year commencing January 1, 2001, for professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, sending a letter to a potential witness that attempted to obstruct another party’s access to evidence and sending a letter to that witness’ employer, a portion of which had no substantial purpose other than to embarrass the witness, in violation of Rules 3.4(a) and 4.4, Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct.

Respondent waives her right to answer and to proceedings under Rule 12(d), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and has entered into a stipulation with the Director wherein they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a one-year suspension to run concurrently with her North Dakota suspension.

This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended discipline.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Shirley A. Dvorak is suspended from the practice of law for one year commencing January 1, 2001, and that the provisions of Rule 18(a)-(e), RLPR, are not waived unless respondent is granted reinstatement in North Dakota following a reinstatement hearing in North Dakota. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs and disbursements pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

BY THE COURT

Alan C. Page Associate Justice RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this ease.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.