Minnesota Supreme Court, 2001

Kilbourne v. PROJECT NET, INC.

Kilbourne v. PROJECT NET, INC.
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided September 14, 2001 · Kathleen
633 N.W.2d 850; 2001 Minn. LEXIS 627; 2001 WL 1106017 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2001, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Kilbourne v. PROJECT NET, INC.

Minnesota statutes cited

Sections of the Minnesota Statutes this opinion cites.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

Plaintiff Project Net, d/b/a Superior Services has moved under Rule 113.03 of the General Rules of Practice for consolidation of the above-entitled cases, presently pending in Dakota and Washington County District Courts. The parties have stipulated to consolidation and to assignment of *851 the case to the Washington County District Court. These cases involve the same parties and common questions of law and fact. The interests of the parties and the judiciary in the efficient administration of justice will be served by adjudication of these cases in one forum. Therefore a single judge will be appointed to hear the cases as authorized by Rule 113.03. The issues of change of venue of the Dakota County case and formal consolidation will be left to the assigned judge.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Minn. R. Gen. Prac. 113.03 and Minn.Stat. §§ 480.16 and 2.724 (2000), the Honorable J. Kenneth Maas of the Tenth Judicial District, having consented, is appointed to hear and decide all matters, including pretrial and trial proceedings, in the above-entitled cases.

BY THE COURT:

Kathleen A. Blatz Chief Justice

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.