Roth v. Cirrus Industries

Minnesota Supreme Court
Roth v. Cirrus Industries, 639 N.W.2d 611 (Minn. 2002)
2002 Minn. LEXIS 151
Gilbert

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 1 citing opinion

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Roth v. Cirrus Industries

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 7, 2001, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 136.01, subd. 1(b).

Employee is awarded $600 in attorney fees.

/s/ James H. Gilbert Associate Justice.

Reference

Full Case Name
Tammy L. ROTH (MILES) v. CIRRUS INDUSTRIES and American International/AIG Claim Services, Relators, and Cloquet Community Memorial Hospital, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, Suburban Radiologic Consultants, Fortis Benefits Insurance Company, Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry/VRU, Northland Neurology & Myology, P.A. and St. Luke's Hospital, Intervenors
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published