Minnesota Supreme Court, 2002

Roth v. Cirrus Industries

Roth v. Cirrus Industries
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided February 19, 2002 · Gilbert
639 N.W.2d 611; 2002 Minn. LEXIS 151 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Timothy M. O’Keefe, Erstad <& Riemer, P.A., Minneapolis, for Employer-Relator., Michael F: Scully, Sieben, Grose, Von Holtum & Carey, Ltd., Minneapolis, for Employee-Respondent., David M. Jaffe, Leonard, Street & Dei-nard, Minneapolis, for Fortis Benefits Ins. Co., Jane McMahon, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, St. Paul, Suburban Radiologic Consultants, Bloomington, Clo-quet Community Memorial Hospital, Clo-quet, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Minneapolis, Ed Adams, Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry/VRU, St. Paul, Northland Neurology & Myology, P.A., Duluth and St. Luke’s Hospital, Duluth, other participants, Intervenors.

Roth v. Cirrus Industries

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 7, 2001, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 136.01, subd. 1(b).

Employee is awarded $600 in attorney fees.

/s/ James H. Gilbert Associate Justice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.