In re Disciplinary Action Against Campbell
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2003, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- German v. IOWA BEEF PRODUCERS (Minn. 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Debra Dillan Campbell has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, that pri- or to her admission to the bar respondent misappropriated funds from several con-servatorships and guardianships over which she had financial control, failed to disclose this information on her application for admission to the bar though required to do so, and after her admission made a misrepresentation concerning the matter in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.1(a)(3), (2) and 8.4(c).
Respondent admits her conduct violated the Rules on Professional Conduct under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is disbarment from the practice of law and payment of $900 in costs under Rule 24, RLPR.
*344 This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Debra Dillan Campbell is disbarred from the practice of law. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs under Rule 24, RLPR.
BY THE COURT:
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.