Minnesota Supreme Court, 2003

In Re Disciplinary Action Against McFarland

In Re Disciplinary Action Against McFarland
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 2003
661 N.W.2d 254; 2003 Minn. LEXIS 276; 2003 WL 21202692 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

In Re Disciplinary Action Against McFarland

Opinion

ORDER

On October 16, 2002, this court suspended respondent Dylan J. McFarland for 30 days. In re McFarland, 652 N.W.2d 536 (Minn. 2002).

Respondent has filed an affidavit for reinstatement in which he states that he has complied with all conditions for reinstatement imposed in the October 16, 2002 order. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed an affidavit stating that to the best of the Director’s knowledge, respondent has complied with all conditions of reinstatement, and that the Director does not oppose reinstatement.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Dylan J. McFarland is reinstated to the practice of law effective immediately.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.