In re Application for Termination of Probation of Heikens
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2003, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
On January 25, 1994, respondent Steve G. Heikens was suspended from the practice of law for a minimum of three years, with that suspension to be retroactive to March 27, 1990, reinstated to the practice of law and placed on supervised probation until further order from this court. In re Heikens, 509 N.W.2d 919 (Minn. 1994).
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a motion for termination of respondent’s probation. The Director indicates that respondent has complied with all conditions of his probation and that the parties agree that respondent’s probation should be terminated.
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Steve G. Heikens’ public probation be, and the same is, terminated effective immediately.
BY THE COURT:
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.