Foster v. Metro Produce Distributing

Minnesota Supreme Court
Foster v. Metro Produce Distributing, 658 N.W.2d 200 (Minn. 2003)
2003 Minn. LEXIS 136
Gilbert

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 1 citing opinion

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Foster v. Metro Produce Distributing

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed December 13, 2002, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minn. R. CivApp. P. 136.01.

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/James H. Gilbert Associate Justice

Reference

Full Case Name
Steven R. FOSTER v. METRO PRODUCE DISTRIBUTING, and Chubb & Son Group, Relators, and Metro Produce Distributing, and Indiana Insurance Companies, and Blue Cross/Blue Shield of MN, Allergy & Asthma Specialists, PA, Jacobs Consulting Service, Intervenors
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published